25 C
New York
Sunday, July 13, 2025

Buy now

Home Blog Page 177

Ford recalls 123K vehicles in US over brake issue: What to know

0


Ford Motor Company is recalling nearly 124,000 vehicles in the U.S. due to a brake issue, officials said. 

recall report dated April 11 and submitted to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration warns of the potential for “substantial loss of brake fluid” which can reduce brake function on the front wheels – increasing the risk of a crash. 

RELATED: 1 in 5 vehicles on US roads have an unresolved recall. Is yours one of them?

Here’s what drivers should know: 

Ford recall over brake issue

What we know:

Ford is recalling certain 2017-2018 Ford F-150, Expedition, and Lincoln Navigator models with 3.5L EcoBoost engines. The recall report states that in some of the impacted vehicles, “the brake master cylinder may allow brake fluid to leak from the brake master cylinder front wheel circuit into the brake booster.”

“Investigation of field return parts found the causes of the brake fluid leak to be brake fluid contamination that could interfere with rear cup seal function or, to a lesser extent, rolling of the rearmost cup seal in the master cylinder,” the notice states.

Ford said it was not aware of any reports of accidents, injuries, or fires related to the issue.

By the numbers:

A total of 123,611 vehicles have been recalled as part of the issue.

RELATED: Ford Motor Company will offer employee pricing to all US shoppers

Dig deeper:

If the issue occurs, the NHTSA said the driver will receive “an audible chime, a message center alert, and a red brake warning indicator.” If the driver continues to operate the vehicle, the driver may begin to notice a change in brake pedal feel, “and increased pedal effort.”

What’s next:

Owners will be notified by mail and instructed to take their vehicle to a Ford or Lincoln dealer to have the brake master cylinder replaced – free of charge, according to the recall notice. The brake booster will also be replaced if the brake master cylinder is leaking. 

Notification letters were expected to be mailed starting on April 28 and completed by May 2, the notice said. 

How to check if your car is under recall

Dig deeper:

Drivers can check if their vehicle is under recall by using the NHTSA’s VIN look up tool: 

The Source: Information for this story was provided by a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle notice, which gives details about the Ford recall. This story was reported from Cincinnati.

RecallsCars and TrucksU.S.



Source link

Nawet Amerykanie piszą o kibicach Legii Warszawa. UEFA ma od dziś świętować

0


  • “Obrzydliwe i wysoce niebezpieczne sceny” – tak West Midlands Police opisała zachowanie fanów z Warszawy, gdy ci zaatakowali funkcjonariuszy w Birmingham
  • “Tym razem wygraliście, UEFA” – przypomina napis z “Żylety” znany dziennikarz i opowiada o wielkim zwrocie akcji z Warszawy
  • Według niego działania fanów Legii “stało się ciągłą walką z dyscyplinarnym ramieniem UEFA”
  • Więcej informacji znajdziesz w Przeglądzie Sportowym Onet 



Source link

Real Madrid’s Champions League ouster by Arsenal reinforces an age-old soccer truth

0


A frustrated Vinicius Jr. reacts during Real Madrid’s thumping by Arsenal over two legs in the Champions League quarterfinals. (REUTERS/Susana Vera)

(REUTERS / Reuters)

Real Madrid has built a peerless brand and an overflowing trophy case on the back of superstars. It has dominated European soccer for decades and cultivated an acclaimed aura, largely because it recruited and bought the very best players in the world. It won Champions League after Champions League, and when it lifted its 15th — more than twice as many as any other club — last spring, it seemed that Los Blancos had conquered this unconquerable competition and solved this unsolvable sport.

Advertisement

But a year later, the sport clapped back.

On Wednesday, Real Madrid slumped out of the Champions League, beaten comprehensively by Arsenal over two legs, 5-1.

Kylian Mbappé and Vinicius Jr. crept off the field after a sour second leg, or simply stood there, dumbfounded, because on paper, their team was more super than ever before; but in practice, soccer is the ultimate team game.

The 2024-25 Champions League has reminded us of that age-old truth. Real Madrid won last year’s edition, then signed Mbappé. The assumption was that, together, they’d go on to win it, or at least compete for it, yet again.

Advertisement

Instead, they regressed. They struggled throughout the league phase. They rode their luck and snuck past Atlético Madrid in the Round of 16, but they couldn’t find a way past Arsenal — because, over 180 minutes, they had no coherent plan.

They had Mbappé and Vini and Jude Bellingham, Luka Modric and Federico Valverde and Rodrygo; but there were no synchronized movements, no innovative ideas, and no penetration of a resolute Arsenal defense.

There was hope, but it was illogical. There was belief, even after a 3-0 first-leg defeat; but it was fueled entirely by the past, by Real Madrid teams of yore.

“It’s not impossible. It’s Madrid,” Spanish newspaper AS said of a potential comeback earlier this week.

Advertisement

“If anyone can do it, it’s Madrid,” Marca proclaimed.

But not this Real Madrid. Ever since Mbappé joined, this version has been remarkably subdued, stagnant and relatively ordinary.

Meanwhile, the club Mbappé left, PSG, has built a humming unit without him. With 11 ego-less players pressing in unison and flying around fields in France, they have built one of the most entertaining teams in Europe. They advanced on Tuesday to the Champions League semifinals, where they’ll meet Arsenal — another well-built, albeit wounded, team without a megastar.

Arsenal's Bukayo Saka celebrates after scoring the opening goal during the Champions League quarterfinals second leg soccer match between Real Madrid and Arsenal at the Santiago Bernabeu stadium in Madrid, Wednesday, April 16, 2025. (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)

Bukayo Saka and Arsenal showed Real Madrid how it’s done with a 5-1 aggregate win in Wednesday’s Champions League quarterfinal. (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)

(ASSOCIATED PRESS)

They advanced — as did Barcelona on Tuesday and Inter Milan on Wednesday — because soccer is not a superstar-driven sport.

Advertisement

It’s about balance and coordinated ball progression.

It’s about attacking patterns and cleverly unlocked space.

It’s about defenders and midfielders and forwards shifting together, and reading one another’s movements, as if on a string.

It’s about all sorts of things that Real Madrid, in constructing its superteam, seemingly ignored.

Los Blancos lost their connection in the first leg. They couldn’t stretch Arsenal in the second. Vini finally capitalized on a Gunners lapse in the second half, but for most of the 90 minutes, he and Mbappé were stifled — by Arsenal, and by themselves, by their own lack of structure, by the absence of a scheme purposefully designed to get them the ball.

Advertisement

And so, they fell, out of the Champions League. They have fallen out of first place in La Liga. They have not won a game by multiple goals since February. They have failed to meet sky-high expectations in Year 1 of the Mbappé era, because they are less than the sum of their parts — whereas Arsenal, PSG and Inter Milan are more.

In Wednesday’s other quarterfinal, Inter held off Bayern to win 4-3 on aggregate and complete the semifinal field. Inter will meet Barcelona, and Arsenal will meet PSG, later this month.

A blow-by-blow recap of Wednesday’s games is below.



Source link

Eintracht Frankfurt vs. Tottenham Hotspur Europa League Preview: Again, still alive

0


In some ways, last week’s first leg was about everything that could have been asked for from a struggling Tottenham Hotspur side. While a single goal on 0.9 xG may not look like an offensive outburst, there were plenty of moments of progressive, decisive attacking that could have led to much more on the score sheet.

However, Thursday’s critical second leg begins at 1-1. Eintracht Frankfurt took advantage of — surprise — a stupid Spurs mistake, and the sides are even heading into a hostile environment that will certainly favor the home team. This is more or less a coin flip in terms of who will end up advancing, which might not be the worst position for Ange Postecoglou after everything this season has suffered. A defeat in Germany is probably the end of the road for him, though.

Quarterfinals (2nd Leg): Eintracht Frankfurt (1) vs. Tottenham Hotspur (1)

Date: Thursday, April 17
Time: 3:00 pm ET, 8:00 pm UK
Location: Deutsche Bank Park, Frankfurt, Germany
TV: Paramount+ (USA), TNT Sports 3 (UK)

Sunday’s disaster at Wolves was nothing new for this squad in domestic play, but for the most part, cup performances have been much better. The first leg does inspire some confidence, and last round’s comeback against AZ gives some hope for a good effort here as well, though that was against a far lesser opponent and at home, of course.

Frankfurt’s goal last week was a quintessential blunder during the Postecoglou era, with an individual mistake compounded by lackluster defensive efforts. Tottenham is simply not good enough to give away these sorts of freebies, yet that continues to be the theme. Turnovers are deadly against an opponent that wants to be aggressive on the break, and more mistakes like this might be too much on the road.

Hopefully another start by the Micky van de Ven-Cristian Romero partnership will provide some additional coverage should those errors continue, but holding this Frankfurt side to just one goal again over 90 minutes is not going to be straightforward. Credit to the defense for limiting the damage last week; an even better effort is needed on Thursday.

A fateful four minutes

Often in sports, the only way to fully evaluate something is with the benefit of hindsight. Regardless of how this tie concludes, supporters will very likely look back at a wild four-minute stretch early in the second half that was somehow unable to break the deadlock in North London. The official website describes it best:

tottenhamhotspur.com

If Spurs are eliminated — especially by a narrow result — it will be hard to forget this sequence of events. The attack has been far from clinical all season, even with a healthy number of goals (third-most in the league). With a leaky defense and inconsistent midfield, capitalizing on these opportunities is imperative, but in the first leg, the home side could only muster a single tally.

And yet. Should Tottenham come out firing in Germany, continuing on last week’s aggression and actually converting on these sorts of chances, then this hectic sequence will be seen as an encouragement, a sign that the team is moving in the right direction and was just getting a little unlucky. It should not take long to figure out if that was the case or not. Hopefully for the sake of history, this series of events was a foreshadowing of incoming production, not a future source of regret.



Source link

The Championship: Every team can still go up or down with four games left

0


Premier League parachute payments have often been accused of distorting competition in the Championship.

In the past 10 seasons half of relegated teams (15 of 30) have bounced straight back to the Premier League.

Although recently relegated Leeds, Burnley and Sheffield United look well placed for an immediate return, Luton – who went down last season – are in danger of dropping into League One.

Over the past decade 14 teams in this year’s Championship have spent time in the top tier, while no team has spent more than 10 years in the division. QPR were relegated in 2015, while Bristol City and Preston – neither of whom have played in the Premier League – were promoted in the same year.

That unpredictability and feeling anyone can beat anyone was highlighted last weekend, when joint-bottom Plymouth beat Sheffield United..

“Ignoring the fact that the clubs relegated from the Premier League have an unfair financial advantage because of parachute payments, a well-run, hardworking, well-coached team that is astute in the transfer market has every chance of making it to the play-offs, where stature counts for nothing,” David from the Forever Bristol City Podcast told BBC Sport.

“Bournemouth, Brentford and Brighton have all shown what can be achieved from humble foundations.”



Source link

OKC’s big bet: Thunder leaning on twin towers in Chet Holmgren, Isaiah Hartenstein

0


OKLAHOMA CITY — There’s a stat sheet within Chet Holmgren’s long reach. His Oklahoma City Thunder just beat the Chicago Bulls for the 62nd of their 68 regular-season wins. But he doesn’t want to see the box score. He grabs it so he can crumple it up.

It has nothing to do with the numbers on it. Holmgren is emphasizing a point. The rising young center with superstar aspirations spent his entire summer sharpening his skill set in belief he was ready for a third-season explosion.

Initial signals were promising. Holmgren put up 25 points, 14 rebounds, five assists, four blocks and two steals in an opening night blowout win in Denver. He outplayed Nikola Jokić. Two weeks later, he capped off a nine-game surge with 29 points in a blowout win over the Houston Rockets. The Thunder were 8-1.

In the 10th game, Golden State Warriors wing Andrew Wiggins drove baseline in the first quarter, nailed Holmgren on his leap to the rim at the right angle and sent the thin Thunder center on a perpendicular fall to the floor at a dangerous angle. Holmgren fractured his hip.

“I worked my tail off last summer,” he tells The Athletic. “I don’t think I really did anything other than just work out and then chill until I could work out again. I came out firing. And then — boom! — get hurt. F—ed up situation.”

That’s when he crumples up the stat sheet and lobs it toward the corner of the Thunder’s meeting room.

“All that work last summer,” Holmgren says with a sigh. “Thrown into the trash can.”

The win total and historic point differential tell the tale of a Thunder dream season. They employ the likely Most Valuable Player, cleared their conference by 16 games and have home court through the NBA Finals if they advance that far. But they’ve had adversity peppered throughout, mostly in regard to their center spot.

This past summer, while Holmgren worked on his body and game, the Thunder used a valuable chunk of cap space to sign a second center in what they felt could be a successful twin-tower approach. On the first day of free agency, general manager Sam Presti and head coach Mark Daigneault flew to Oregon to pitch Isaiah Hartenstein on a three-year, $87 million contract.

“It’s not like I was in a nice little Los Angeles setup,” Hartenstein told The Athletic. “We were in some random hotel in Eugene. Can’t remember the name.”

In their second-round loss to the Dallas Mavericks last May, the Thunder’s rebounding flaws and lack of interior depth hurt in a series decided by the slimmest of margins. Dallas beat them up on the glass. So the Thunder targeted and signed Hartenstein because they felt he was the type of player and personality who could shore-up the weakness while fitting in with their strengths.

But Hartenstein broke his left hand in the preseason and didn’t return until after Holmgren fractured his hip. By the time he re-entered the lineup, Holmgren was stuck in bed, stir-crazy from an injury that tested his mental resilience.

“Man, you don’t…” Holmgren pauses. “I feel like I had a decent idea of my gratitude for just being able to live a regular life. Because when I had my foot surgery (as a rookie), I was on a scooter. I couldn’t walk, obviously. It made life more difficult. But I was still pretty mobile.”

Holmgren then repositions himself in his seat, contorting his 7-foot-1 frame to lie uncomfortably on his side in a stretched-out position.

“Bedridden,” Holmgren said. “When you have a fractured hip, you are laying in this position for four weeks in bed. Then another two weeks on crutches. So I couldn’t f—ing move, I couldn’t do anything. Teams are practicing, still working on their rhythm, getting things going, getting in shape. And I was in bed. Sitting like this. I couldn’t move. It was f—ed up. But, again, you’re given situations and circumstances. Some are more f—ed up than others. Some are in your control. Some aren’t. It’s all about what you do with them.”

Without Holmgren and Hartenstein, the Thunder found a bunch of small-ball lineups that worked. They ripped off a ton of wins. They integrated Hartenstein into the mix and he found a rhythm with his new teammates. They ripped off more wins. Holmgren spent the middle portion of his rehab process working on a quicker catch-and-shoot trigger and believes his 3-point shot is in a better place. Progress was made.

But the Thunder signed Hartenstein to play next to Holmgren and raise their playoff ceiling. Through 49 games, they had logged zero minutes together. So when Holmgren was finally cleared in the season’s 50th game, Daigneault started the two centers together. They needed to speed up the familiarity process.

“You have 48 minutes at the five,” Daigneault said.And if you take those two guys, they should account for more than 48 minutes between them. And so it puts you in a position where it’s like, do you want to get your best players on the court or not? The answer to us is yes, we’d like to get our best players on the court. Sometimes you have to adapt tactically or lineup-wise in order to do that.”

Holmgren and Hartenstein were both active on the same night 20 times this season. Daigneault got them on the floor 316 minutes together. It isn’t a gigantic sample — 39 other Thunder two-man combinations played more together — but it isn’t insignificant either. Daigneault said it’s enough to make him feel comfortable entering the playoffs.

“It would be more uncomfortable if it was like really stalling,” Daigneault said. “If it wasn’t getting off the ground or if it was low-impact or if it was clunky, then that’s a harder decision of (how much to use it). But it was good right away in unpredictable ways.”

The Holmgren and Hartenstein twin-tower combination outscored opponents by 96 points in their 316 minutes together. It had an offensive rating of 122.9 and a defensive rating of 109.4, both impressive.


(Benny Sieu / Imagn Images)

It is, unsurprisingly, the best rebounding combination (77.4 percent rebound rate) of any of their top-50 most used two-man groups. They’ve walled off the basket. Daigneault called Holmgren and Hartenstein “easily” two of the league’s top-10 rim protectors. But it’s the other side that has him encouraged.

“The offensive flow that we’ve been able to maintain with two seven-footers on the floor (is key),” Daigneault said. “It’s something that always concerns you when you go super big. But I think it speaks to how skilled those guys are. They’re both in their own way very dynamic.”

It wasn’t an immediate click. There have been awkward moments and empty stretches.

“The first three games I was like, ‘Uhhh, I don’t know how this might work,’” Hartenstein said. “We were trying to get out of each other’s way but through that we got in each other’s way, if that makes sense.”

Daigneault brought Hartenstein and Holmgren together after a home practice and they watched a bunch of film together to iron out the flaws.

“Mark is such a smart coach,” Hartenstein said. “Then we’re both really smart players. So we kind of talked through it. We started to be more aggressive.”

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Jalen Williams missed a couple games here and there, giving Hartenstein and Holmgren a bit more offensive freedom to explore in lineup combinations without their primary scorers.

“It switches on and off,” Hartenstein said. “Either I’m facilitating to him or he’s facilitating to me. And I think it’s been impressive how he’s coming off handoffs, not just looking to score, still making a good pass, read, or coming off a pick and roll at 7-foot-1. It doesn’t look like a 7-1 pick and roll. He moves like a guard.”

Hartenstein’s passing ability, screening genius and low-usage approach help it work.

“It’s not like I’m just standing in the way or asking for lobs,” he said.

But it’s Holmgren’s unique skill set that even allowed the Thunder to explore the Hartenstein idea. He wouldn’t have come if it was to just strictly be Holmgren’s backup. But Holmgren can shoot, pass, dribble and playmake to a rare degree for a 7-footer. Plus he has some experience in what he called a “hybrid” role, playing center on defense but some power forward on offense in college at Gonzaga with Drew Timme in the post.

“I’d still say what’s being asked of me is a lot different,” Holmgren said. “Because he’s kind of like the connection hub. Whoever’s at the five for us is kind of the connection hub and he’s out there screening, handoffs, playing in those short rolls. So I’m basically, I wouldn’t even call it the four. We have whoever’s handling the ball, we have the (center) connect things and then we just have wings basically. Spacers, cutters, wings.”

The Thunder enter the playoffs confident their double-big approach can work against any type of lineup “or any team,” Daigneault said. But for it to turn into one of the swing factors in the Western Conference, lifting the Thunder franchise to its first finals since 2012, there’s an internal feeling that it must turn from great to elite on the defensive end.

“Actually, 108 (defensive rating) is really good,” Daigneault said. “But I think it’s got more upside because they’re not used to being on the perimeter that much, specifically Chet.”

For Hartenstein, the job responsibility remains much of the same. He will typically guard the opposing center and be the one asked to protect the paint in a more traditional sense. Holmgren is the one thrown out of his defensive comfort zone. This is the first time he’s played in a lineup when he isn’t the primary rim protector.

“Honestly, the challenge when I’m playing more of a perimeter spot on defense isn’t even guarding the ball or guarding a primary person in action,” Holmgren said. “If I’m chasing over a screen, I’ve done pretty good there.”

Then he paused to think how much he should detail it.

“I can say this because it’s on tape,” Holmgren said. “My problem is as a shot blocker — and any shot blocker will tell you this — your first instinct is the ball.”

Daigneault, Holmgren and Hartenstein referenced a road game against the Sacramento Kings in late March. The Thunder won easily and only gave up 105 points to a productive offense, which is something Daigneault emphasized. But they put Hartenstein on Domantas Sabonis and had Holmgren guard Keegan Murray, a knockdown 3-point shooter.

Murray hit nine 3s. Most of them were when Holmgren wandered too far off of him, falling victim to his instinct to roam and prioritize paint protection over the perimeter. Here are two first-quarter examples where Holmgren (left side of both plays) sags too far off Murray while Sabonis is posting up against Hartenstein and then ventures too far into the mix when he should stay closer to Murray.

That’s a night that Holmgren views as a frustration point but a valuable regular-season learning lesson considering the type of offensive challenges that await in the playoffs.

“Keegan was hitting shots and a lot of those came on overhelps,” Holmgren said. “You take away those 3s that he hit and they score like 65 points… You can’t shut anybody out, but if we can make it extremely tough on all areas of the floor, what’s that look like? What can we be if we don’t give those looks?”

The Thunder believe that answer can be a championship. To obtain that goal, they plan to deploy Holmgren and Hartenstein together plenty in a twin-tower approach they didn’t have in their toolbox in their previous playoff run.

“The reason we’ve gone small in the past is to get our best guys on the court,” Daigneault said. “It’s the reason why we’ll go big now. We don’t want to be beholden to one way of playing. We want to figure out how to get to our highest impact players and those guys are obviously two of our highest-impact players.”


(Illustration: Demetrius Robinson / The Athletic; Photos: William Purnell and Patrick Smith / Getty Images)



Source link

Western Conference: One stat defining every team & what it means

0


The 2025 season is nearly a quarter done, which means underlying numbers really are starting to tell us some stuff.

With that in mind, here’s one telling stat (from Opta unless otherwise noted) for each Western Conference team, in order of points per game:

Look, I’m too old to have watched that show, but I understand the point of the meme. And here it is in soccer form, courtesy of John Muller:

There is simply no one stat to capture the breadth and depth of Vancouver’s year-over-year improvement. They are better in literally every way you’d want a team to be better, have become sustainable in ways you’d want them to be sustainable, and oh yeah, are playing a brand of soccer that makes them one of the three S-Tier teams in the league when it comes to aesthetics.

In John’s words on BlueSky, “Is it time to do it anyway just to laugh incredulously at what the Whitecaps are doing? Hell yes.”

Sometimes when I’m watching a great TV show, there are scenes so perfectly written, acted, and directed that I get goosebumps and just sort of start giggling maniacally at how beautiful it is.

That’s what it’s like watching the Vancouver Whitecaps play soccer this year. Jesper Sørensen for king IMO.

I can’t get over how little of the ball the Loons are getting. For as far back as we have possession data, the previous lowest percent I can find is 41.2%, by the 2017 ‘Caps. Usually, the lowest possession mark in the league is around 43 or 44 percent.

Eric Ramsay’s very obviously got himself a different sort of game model, one that 1) is very effective – they’re second in the West on PPG, after all, and 2) generates a ton of high-quality looks. Which is to say they lead the league in big chances (tied with the ‘Caps and, surprisingly, Orlando), are third in xG per shot and are fifth in the percentage of their shots they take from inside the box.

I love that we have such variation among the top two teams in the conference. Vancouver and Minnesota could not be more different in how they approach the game. The fact that it’s working so well for both is one of the things I love most about this league.

That’s Zack Steffen’s goals saved over expected per 90 so far this season. It’s the highest number in the American Soccer Analysis database for any ‘keeper who’s played 500+ minutes in a season, going back to 2013, and to put into context how good he’s been: Steffen’s number is 42% better than Djordje Petrović’s 2022 masterclass that got him a $20 million move to Chelsea (the single best shot-stopping season I’ve ever seen in MLS), and about 70% better than Matt Turner’s best MLS year.

I’m doing quarter-season awards next week, and somebody’s going to need to talk me out of putting Steffen as the MVP thus far this year.

This guy’s on an all-time heater. And Colorado, who haven’t played great, have needed all of it.

I’m still skeptical of Portland’s relatively hot start here – they’ve played a pretty easy schedule, looked overwhelmed against the two quality teams they’ve faced so far, and are basically limited to transition moments for consistent attacking effectiveness (something head coach Phil Neville referenced in his postgame presser last week).

However, they’re maybe not quite as bad defensively as the underlying numbers say? Their total xG allowed through eight games is 11.5, good for just the 10th-best defense in the West and in the bottom third of the league overall. However, their non-penalty xG faced is 8.3, which bumps them towards the top of West standings (it’s worth noting James Pantemis has saved three of the four penalties he’s faced – he’s been awesome).

So are the penalties they’re conceding a feature or a bug? I don’t know yet. What I do know is if they can cut it out, they’ve got a good chance of finishing top four and getting home-field advantage in the first round of the playoffs come autumn.

Los Niños are among that trio of teams playing that S-Tier, beautiful, effective soccer. At the start of the season, I thought it was all going to come from pure possession, which leads to pitch control, which leads to the types of positional play (sorry for all the alliteration) goals we’ve seen in years past from the likes of the Dynamo or the best versions of NYCFC.

There is still an element of that, but it’s not who San Diego are. What they are is a possession-dominant team that tends to hold possession deeper to draw the opponents upfield, allowing one DP winger to pinch inside while the other runs in behind. Or sometimes it’s the center forward (Onni Valakari, a midfielder by trade, has been a revelation as a false 9) dropping in to release both wingers.

Or sometimes it’s d-mid Jeppe Tverskov. Hell, even right back Jasper Löffelsend gets in on the act:

And so they’ve hit 25 through-balls this year. Nobody else has hit more than 16. The Whitecaps and Crew combined have hit 20.

It’s like they’ve fused the principles of the ‘Caps and the Loons into one gorgeous game model.

The idea for La Verde, at least to start the year, seems to be something Minnesota-ish in terms of where they draw their line of confrontation (really deep), how much of the ball they get (not much!), and how they create their chances (on the break).

The issue is the Loons have Robin Lod and Joaquín Pereyra in central midfield, diming up runners and exploiting space created by that low block.

Austin’s midfielders haven’t been able to do that, and so record signing Myrto Uzuni – an open-field terror in Spain, both in LaLiga and the Segunda Liga – is suffering. He’s managed just 0.161 xG in transition this year, which is 71st in the league. Not good enough.

They need to start getting him looks, and while they’re at it, they need to figure out how to get Uzuni and Brandon Vazquez on the same page.

That’s the number of possessions LAFC are generating per game that end in the attacking third, which is just 20th in the league. Last year, they were ninth with 36.26. In 2023, they were second with 40.79. In 2022, they were first with 42.08.

So forget, for a moment, Denis Bouanga’s slow start to the season, or Olivier Giroud’s struggles, or the fact that the electric David Martínez has seen his role reduced over the past month. And think, instead, about the types of classy, ball-playing midfielders who’ve been shown the door over the past few years – including Eduard Atuesta and Ilie Sánchez after last season.

Then think about this meme (I can’t remember who created it; apologies!) for a second:

LAFC are squarely in the “ball magically moves to other side of the pitch, dw” phase. They have, I think, prioritized grit and field coverage over progressive passing ability, and they’ve become a less dynamic, more predictable attacking team because of it.

I joked at the start of the year that “it’s rare to see a team’s philosophy and personnel aligned so perfectly, but LAFC have done it. They’ve spent the past three years slowly getting rid of all their creative midfielders, and now they play like a team that doesn’t have any creative midfielders.”

I really wasn’t joking, though.

Lucho Acosta is getting nearly 25% of Dallas’s total touches in the attacking third, which is not a bad thing. The whole point of having a No. 10 is for that guy to get on the ball in good spots and either solve problems for your team or cause problems for the opposing team, and Acosta’s doing some of both. He’s still doing it at a high level, too – he’s completing 4.2 passes over his expected (per 100 passes), which tells you there’s still precision to go with the raw creativity he brings to the table.

The problem is that these numbers are all down from 2024:

  • Total passes in the attacking third per 90: 26.29 to 23.12
  • Passing accuracy: 70.6% to 63.7%
  • Passes completed over expected per 100: 5.72 to 4.21

I don’t think this is a Lucho thing. I think this is a chemistry thing, and a “the run makes the pass” kind of thing. As in, the other Dallas attackers haven’t figured out how to be dynamic off the ball, which has made Lucho less dynamic on the ball.

They’ve got to figure out how to get this man some options.

The Quakes have generated the most expected goals in the league, with 16.7. The Quakes have conceded the most expected goals in the league, with 16.3. Add ‘em up.

The next closest teams, in terms of total xG generated across all their games, are San Diego and Orlando with just over 26. Quakes games are wild, man. Just pure chaosball.

I can assure you, however, that Bruce Arena and staff are working on how to tighten things up as the season trucks along, as this is no way to actually go out and win a trophy (which is where Bruce’s sights have always been set). They need to figure out how to get more pressure on the ball through their first two lines so that the defense isn’t constantly scrambling and so Daniel, their outstanding goalkeeper, is not always having to be Superman.

Can they do it without throttling back on what’s been a pretty outrageous attack so far?

The Jesús Ferreira false 9 thing has not worked for the Sounders. Ferreira’s a good player, and I still think it was the right decision to acquire him, and I expect it to work out long-term (though probably as a second forward rather than a false 9).

But you can see the difference between his effectiveness in the attacking third in xG per shot compared to the two true No. 9s on the Sounders:

  • Danny Musovski: 0.311 xG per shot, first among forwards (150+ minutes played)
  • Jordan Morris: 0.261 xG per shot, seventh among forwards
  • Ferreira: 0.070 xG per shot, 85th among forwards

With Morris back soon, I’d expect Ferreira to get most of the rest of his minutes this year either as a second forward or as a playmaker. And I’d expect CSO Craig Waibel to look for a third No. 9 to add to the depth chart behind Morris (and maybe ahead of Musovski, whose finishing struggles – last weekend excepted – have driven more than a few Sounders fans over the edge).

RSL have spent a lot more time chasing the game this season, and as a result, have spent a lot more time playing emergency defense. As a result, they’re making 7.25 tackles per 90 in the defensive third, which is 16th in the league. Sounds not bad, right?

Well, last year they made 5.82 tackles in the defensive third, which was dead last. Big change.

At the same time, their tackles in the middle third have dropped from 7.00 per 90, which was third in the league, to 5.63, which is 19th.

They pretty clearly haven’t quite figured out their structure yet and are spending a lot of time behind the play. Literally. And that’s forced the backline into a lot of desperate moments, which feels like a significant regression from last year’s club-record 59-point season.

That’s the number of take-ons – 1v1s – St. Louis are generating per game, which is tied for 28th in the league. And is a really, really low number for a team that plays a 3-4-2-1 (or a 3-4-1-2), which ostensibly means they’re supposed to have two wide attackers in those wingback spots. A huge point of the 3-4-2-1 is to get the ball to those guys in stride against a rotating, back-pedaling defense, because it’s easier to beat a rotating, back-pedaling defender in order to create chances.

Most other 3-4-2-1 teams are at or near the top of the league in take-ons per game, and are successful over 40% of the time in those 1v1s.

CITY are not only near 28th in total number of 1v1s generated; they’re 27th in success rate at just 36.9%.

I am simply begging Olof Mellberg to stop playing center backs out there.

I put a lot of stock into ASA’s “receiving – goals added” metric, which is just a measure of “are you getting into good spots to receive dangerous passes?” And here’s a little light of hope for Dynamo fans, who have mostly been disappointed by DP No. 9 Ezequiel Ponce so far this year: that +0.02 receiving g+ per 90 is actually ok.

It’s not great, mind you. Brian White’s at +0.24, as is Christian Benteke.

But Ponce’s not alone on +0.02. Guys like Christian Ramírez, Alonso Martínez, Luis Muriel and Petar Musa – professional goal-scorers, all – are in the same neighborhood.

Everything else about Ponce’s game (shooting, dribbling, fouling, etc.) is under water as per ASA, which isn’t great. But as long as he keeps getting on the ball in good spots, he should eventually figure out how to be a pretty decent MLS No. 9, all of which should get easier as attacking reinforcements arrive in the coming weeks.

It hasn’t been an easy transition to MLS for Manu García, Sporting’s big offseason acquisition. The Spanish No. 10 struggled to get on the ball in good spots and to, for lack of a better term, just make stuff happen (for the most part, anyway), despite his obvious skill on the ball.

Things started to shift in the final game of the Peter Vermes era, and over the subsequent two outings under interim manager Kerry Zavagnin, García’s been getting on the ball in better spots and doing more with it for a KC attack that suddenly looks dangerous (the defense has looked dangerous in a different way).

García’s now in the 97th percentile of shot-creating actions, as per FBRef. That’s involvement in “the two offensive actions directly leading to a shot, such as passes, take-ons, and drawing fouls.”

Garcia’s not really a through-ball artist – at least, he hasn’t shown to be yet – but he’s very comfortable receiving the ball in tight quarters, and then clever once he does so. That’s led to better passing sequences in the attacking third over the past few weeks, and more drawn fouls.

This stat’s kind of a blunt instrument, but I like it a lot as a measure of “are you out there making good things happen for your team in tough spots?” I think we’re really starting to see that from Garcia, and Sporting’s a much more fun team to watch because of it.

Last year’s Galaxy were a not-very-good 18th in the league in aerial duels in their own defensive third, winning just 53%. This year, they’ve dropped to a near-catastrophic 26th at that 48.1 winning percentage above. And it gets worse in the box itself, as they’re winning just 46.7% of their aerial duels in their own 18.

This is all downstream of the Riqui Puig injury. Last year’s attack was championship-caliber, but the defense wasn’t until Emiro Garcés got into the XI. That changed everything because it allowed the Galaxy to play higher and take more risks with the ball – playing directly into Riqui’s strengths – since Garcés is a one-man transition eraser.

That’s a less valuable defensive skillset this year with the Galaxy playing deeper and allowing more box entries, and it’s compounded by the fact that Garcés has struggled mightily at recognizing incipient aerial duels. He contests just 1.52 per 90, which is basically a fullback’s number (he’s just behind Julián Aude’s 1.68 per 90 and just ahead of John Nelson’s 1.38).

Remember, this passivity almost cost the Galaxy the lead in last year’s MLS Cup:

Sadly, Zanka’s been even worse than Garcés at aerial duel frequency or winning percentage in the box.

There is no clear personnel answer in the middle of the Galaxy’s backline right now if they’re going to pull themselves out of this winless nosedive to start the season.





Source link

PSG top, Chelsea over Arsenal? Best European teams right now

0


Eight months is a long time. When the Premier League’s season began on Aug. 16, Manchester City’s Rodri had yet to tear his ACL, Barcelona’s Raphinha was still seen as a relatively disappointing signing (as opposed to a potential 2025 Ballon d’Or winner), Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” was about three months old, and the U.S. presidential election was still nearly three months away.

That feels like a millennium ago, but the single soccer season that has played out in that time has offered us countless plot twists, from Paris Saint-Germain’s disappointing Champions League start, to Manchester City’s early-season collapse, to Liverpool’s winter dominance, to PSG’s spring surge and so on. The teams that were great months ago aren’t necessarily the ones that are great now.

So, with the season entering its home stretch — the Champions League semifinals will be set after Wednesday, and both the Premier League’s title and relegation races are about done already — let’s look at the most in-form teams of the moment.

Below are the top 15 teams in what I’m calling “adjusted goal differential” in all competitions since Feb. 16, exactly two months ago. Some of these teams still have lots to play for, others are simply playing out the string, and the amount of good fortune they’re enjoying has varied significantly. Regardless, they’re all playing pretty well at the moment.

What I’m calling “Adjusted Goal Differential” is a mix of 30% goal differential and 70% xG differential in 11v11 situations. Because of the inherent randomness of goals, incorporating both xG and actual goals is a good way of measuring shot quality while still accounting for finishing skill.

The list below isn’t opponent-adjusted, and two months isn’t a long enough time to generate a true, predictive sample. But a list such as this can still tell us who is in the best raw form right now. (It also pretty accurately tells us who the best team in Europe is at the moment. It’s hard to dispute PSG’s and their current levels of awesomeness, even if things got a little wobbly at Aston Villa.)



Source link

‘Die, scum’ – Real Madrid star targeted with horrific chants during Alavés clash

0


‘Die, scum’ – Real Madrid star targeted with horrific chants during Alavés clash

Real Madrid’s La Liga meeting with Deportivo Alavés this evening was brought to a temporary halt by the team of officials.

This came owing to a round of disgusting chants aimed in the direction of a member of the former’s squad.

Advertisement

The player in question? Raúl Asencio.

Real Madrid were of course back in action a short time ago, making the trip to Mendizorroza for a clash with the aforementioned Deportivo Alavés.

Defender Asencio for his part featured from the off in the fixture, from his customary berth at the heart of Carlo Ancelotti’s backline.

As alluded to above, though, en route to an eventual 1-0 Blancos triumph, the 22-year-old was on the receiving end of some altogether over the top abuse on the part of the home crowd.

First, chants of ‘Asencio, die’ were heard coming from the stands at Mendizorroza.

After the game was halted to allow for an announcement condemning such shouts, sections of the Alavés faithful then followed up with:

Advertisement

“Asencio, scum, get out of Vitoria!”



Source link

Christian Norgaard tackle on Gabriel Martinelli could have broken my leg, says Arsenal winger | Football News

0


Arsenal winger Gabriel Martinelli said Brentford captain Christian Norgaard “could have broken my leg” with his first-half tackle – and the midfielder should have been sent off for a “nasty” challenge.

Norgaard brought down the Arsenal winger with a lunging tackle in the first half, much to the uproar of the home fans at the Emirates Stadium.

Gunners boss Mikel Arteta remonstrated with the fourth official and the Brentford bench as referee Simon Hooper brandished a yellow card, with VAR choosing not to upgrade the decision.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Saturday Night Football panel discuss whether Norgaard should have received a red card for his tackle on Martinelli

“I didn’t see that again but in the moment, if my foot was on the floor, he could break my leg,” Martinelli told Sky Sports after the 1-1 draw.

“He [Norgaard] said he didn’t mean it. I believe him but still he could have broke my leg. For me it was red. I need to see it again to be sure. But for me it was nasty.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

FREE TO WATCH: Highlights from Arsenal’s match against Brentford in the Premier League

Asked about the tackle after his side drew 1-1 with Brentford, Arteta replied to Sky Sports: “My reaction says everything.” Meanwhile, Brentford boss Thomas Frank added: “That’s his opinion. I thought it was a strong yellow.”

It is the second Premier League refereeing decision Arsenal have felt aggrieved by in the space of seven days, after the decision to award Everton a penalty for a “soft” foul on Myles Lewis-Skelly in the 1-1 draw at Goodison Park.

“There’s no way, in my opinion, that’s a penalty,” said Arteta after that game, while Ref Watch’s Dermot Gallagher agreed the spot-kick should not have been given.

Norgaard’s tackle in photos

Norgaard fouls Martinelli with the Arsenal winger on the break
Image:
Norgaard fouls Martinelli with the Arsenal winger on the break

Norgaard was two feet off the ground
Image:
Norgaard was two feet off the ground

Norgaard was booked by referee Simon Hooper
Image:
Norgaard was booked by referee Simon Hooper

Redknapp: I’ve been injured by that tackle but it’s not a red

Sky Sports’ Jamie Redknapp:

“Very rarely do you see a red card for this but it’s not a great tackle and one that can hurt players.

“I got a very bad injury for someone doing that exact same tackle on me as you can get your leg caught and twist your knee. That’s never been a red card so we can’t start asking for them now.

“Mikel Arteta should be more frustrated about his team not winning the game than about the tackle. It seems like he thinks there’s a conspiracy against him and his team – there isn’t. That’s just the way it goes.

“It’s a tackle that long-term we have to look at though. The reason I said it’s not a red as it’s never been given as a red card but it is a really dangerous one.

“When you scissor tackle you risk knees and ankles caught underneath you – I had to have surgery after one.

“It’s a nasty tackle. An old-fashioned tackle. Some tackles have been eradicated out of the game but that one hasn’t gone to a red card yet.

“I don’t like the tackle. It’s a pure desperation tackle.

“He’s not a nasty player. To call it a red card or a nasty tackle, I don’t see it as that. But Martinelli is lucky as it could be a six-months injury with ones like that.”

The controversial decisions that have gone against Arsenal this season

Arsenal 1-1 Brighton, August 31: Declan Rice was controversially sent off by referee Chris Kavanagh after he stopped a Brighton free-kick while already booked, earning him a second yellow card. Brighton go on to dominate the game and snatch a second-half equaliser.

Points dropped in match: 2

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PGMOL chief Howard Webb agrees VAR had ‘no choice’ but to give Rice a second booking and send him off against Brighton for kicking the ball away

Man City 2-2 Arsenal, September 22: Leandro Trossard was given a second yellow card by referee Michael Oliver for kicking the ball away after Manchester City were awarded a free-kick. Arsenal were winning 2-1 at the time, before City salvaged a 2-2 draw late on.

Points dropped in match: 2

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Leandro Trossard was sent off after picking up a second booking for kicking the ball away during Manchester City’s Premier League match against Arsenal

Bournemouth 2-0 Arsenal, October 19: William Saliba brings down Evanilson as the last defender with the score at 0-0. Referee Rob Jones initially awards a yellow card but VAR Jarred Gillet upgrades it to a red on review. Bournemouth go on to score twice in the second half.

Points dropped in match: 3

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Listen to the discussion between VAR Jarred Gillett and referee Rob Jones which resulted in Arsenal’s William Saliba being sent-off after a foul on Evanilson at Bournemouth

Brighton 1-1 Arsenal, January 4: With Arsenal leading 1-0, referee Anthony Taylor awards Brighton a penalty – which they score from – after William Saliba clashes heads with Joao Pedro, despite the Arsenal defender getting a touch on the ball.

Points dropped in match: 2

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Jamie Redknapp and Steve Sidwell discuss Brighton’s penalty against Arsenal and are critical of the Gunners’ defensive pair Gabriel and William Saliba, labelling their defending as ‘chaotic’

Wolves 0-1 Arsenal, January 25: Myles Lewis-Skelly is sent off by referee Michael Oliver for a high tackle on Matt Doherty. Arsenal go on to win 1-0 but only after Wolves’ Joao Gomes is sent off to make it 10-vs-10. Lewis-Skelly’s red card is overturned on appeal.

Points dropped in match: 0

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PGMOL chief Howard Webb explains his thoughts on the Miles Lewis-Skelly’s sending off against Wolves before the 18-year-old’s three-match ban was then overturned

Everton 1-1 Arsenal, April 5: With Arsenal leading 1-0, referee Darren England awards Everton a penalty – which they score from – after Lewis-Skelly is accused of bringing down Jack Harrison. Lewis-Skelly’s contact started outside the box before carrying in.

Points dropped in match: 2

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Watch the controversial incident that awarded Everton a penalty against Arsenal

Arsenal 1-1 Brentford, April 12: Brentford captain Christian Norgaard avoids a red card for bringing down Gabriel Martinelli. The Bees go on to claim a 1-1 draw at the Emirates.

Points dropped in match: 2



Source link